Four weeks, an hour or two a week, in dependency order: access first, then identity, then evidence, then measurement.
Most AEO advice assumes a team. This assumes you, an hour or two a week, and a list of forty other things that are also on fire.
The order matters more than the pace. Each week gates the next: there is no point earning citations for a site the crawler cannot fetch, and no point writing an About page for a site with no coherent name. If you fall behind, stay in order rather than skipping ahead.
Week 1 — Access
Goal: a crawler can fetch your pages and get real HTML. This is binary, it is cheap, and it invalidates everything downstream if it is broken.
- Read
yoursite.example/robots.txt. Find any AI user-agent group you did not deliberately create. What each one is. - Decide, once, on training crawlers versus answer crawlers. Write the decision in a comment in the file. The trade-offs.
-
curl -sI -A "...GPTBot/1.2..." https://yoursite.exampleand check for a200. A403means your WAF is overriding your intent. Fixing that. -
curl -sL https://yoursite.example | head -100. If it is an empty<div id="root">, you have a rendering problem and it is now the most important thing on this list. Why, and the minimum fix.
Done when: a bot user-agent gets a 200 with real markup in the body.
Week 2 — Identity
Goal: a machine can say what your company is called and what it does.
- Write down your canonical set: brand name, legal name, canonical URL, one-sentence description, logo URL. This is a decision, not a task, and it is the hour that matters most. The five fields.
- Add or fix your
OrganizationJSON-LD on the homepage, server-rendered. Field by field. - Check you picked the right
@type. If customers physically visit you, it isLocalBusiness. The rule. - Grep your templates for stale variants of the brand name — footer, OG tags, email templates, site title config.
- Rewrite the first paragraph of your About page so it states who, what and for whom in three sentences. What good looks like.
Done when: an assistant asked "what is <your brand>?" in a fresh session gives a correct, unhedged answer.
Week 3 — Evidence
Goal: sources you do not own agree with you.
- List every profile your company has. Kill or claim the dead ones.
- Update the survivors so name, description, logo and website match the canonical set exactly.
- Claim and complete your Crunchbase profile. Check the category is right. Why it is first.
- Claim your review-site profiles if your category has them, and fix the category selection — it is frequently wrong and it decides which comparisons you appear in.
- Add every profile URL to your schema's
sameAs. The connective tissue. - Twenty minutes: write
/llms.txt. Last, because it is the smallest of these. What it is and is not.
Done when: sameAs lists four or more live profiles that all describe you the same way and all link back.
Week 4 — Measurement and the next quarter
Goal: know where you actually stand, and have a list for next quarter.
- Write five buyer questions with no brand name in them. Save them — you will reuse this exact set every quarter.
- Run them. Record the hit rate, the competitors named, and the sources cited. How to read the three numbers.
- Take the top three competitors and do the ten-minute entity read on each. The six checks.
- Take the cited sources and sort them: present and correct, present and wrong, absent. Fix the wrong ones first — that is the fastest win on the list. Source by source.
- Pick two absent sources to pursue over the next quarter. Two, not ten.
Done when: you have a number, a competitor list, and two named targets.
What month two looks like
Nothing on this list repeats weekly, which is the point. After the first month the work is:
- Re-run the five questions once a quarter, not weekly. The noise floor is higher than any change one week produces.
- Re-scan after any site change that touches templates, hosting, or your CDN configuration — those are how access breaks silently.
- Keep pursuing the two off-site targets. This is the part that takes months and it is the part that compounds.
The realistic expectation
Weeks 1 and 2 are the ones with a fast feedback loop — fix an access problem and it can show up within weeks. Week 3 compounds slowly. Week 4 tells you which of the other three to spend more on.
And the honest ceiling: if a competitor is named because they are genuinely the better fit for the question, no amount of markup changes that. This plan removes the reasons a machine has to leave you out. It does not manufacture reasons to put you in.
